| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions. Connect your Gmail, DriveDropbox, and Slack accounts and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio will automatically organize all your file attachments. Learn more and claim your free account.

View
 

Scenario References

Page history last edited by Hazel Owen 10 years, 1 month ago
     
Introduction Scenario ICTELT Model Possible Approaches
Key Design Points Programme of Social Services Appendices References
 

References

Agostinho, S. (2006). The use of visual learning design representation to document and communicate teaching ideas [Electronic Version]. Proceedings of ASCILTE 2006, Sydney. Retrieved March 23 2007 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p173.pdf.

 

Al-Jarf, R. S. (2004). Effect of Online Learning on Struggling ESL College Writers. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 1-18.

 

Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models for instructional design Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2-15.

Armitage, S., & O’Leary, R. (2003). A guide for learning technologists. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN).

 

Barnes, L., Scutter, S., & Young, J. (2005). Using screen recording and compression software to support online learning. Innovate Retrieved June 04, 2005, from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=52

 

Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

 

Barrow, R. (1984). Giving Teaching back to Teachers: A critical introduction to curriculum theory. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.

 

Botturi, L., Derntl, M., Boot, E., & Figl, K. (2005). A classification framework for Educational Modelling Language in Instructional Design [Electronic Version]. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Retrieved February 22 2007 from http://www.ask4research.info/icalt/2006.

 

Boyle, T. (2002). Towards a theoretical base for educational multimedia design. Journal of Interactive Multimedia in Education, 2, 64-85.

 

Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 89-112.

 

Britain, S. (2004). A review of learning design. Concept, specifications and tools [Electronic Version]. Retrieved February 22 2005.

 

Britain, S., & Liber, O. (2004). A Framework for Pedagogical Evaluation of Virtual Learning Environments (Revised) [Electronic Version]. Retrieved February 21 2005 from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/VLEFull Report8.doc.

 

Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.

 

Chan, B. (2002). A study of the relationship between tutor's personality and teaching effectiveness: Does culture make a difference? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning Retrieved January 19, 2007, from http://www.irrodl.org/content/v3.2/chan.html.

 

Chen, A., Mashhadi, A., Ang, D., & Harkrider, N. (1999). Cultural issues in the design of technology-enhanced learning systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 217-230.

 

Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 211-284). New York: Cambridge University Press.

 

Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world. London: Kogan Page.

Commission of the European Communities. (2000). E-Learning – Designing tomorrow's education [Electronic Version]. Retrieved January 2 2004 from http: //www.eun.org.

 

Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching. In Davis, Maher & Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 142-157). Reston, Virginia: JRME Monograph, NCTM.

Conole, G. (2005). Bridging the gap: A review of e-learning research at Southampton [Electronic Version]. ELRC conference. Retrieved June 30 2008 from http://www.elrc.ac.uk/download/presentations/bridgingthegap/four-GrainneConole.ppt.

 

Conole, G. (2008). Capturing practice: the role of mediating artefacts in learning design. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies (pp. 1-22).

 

Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers and Education, 43(1-2), 17-33.

 

Conole, G., & Fill, K. (2005). A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities [Electronic Version]. Journal of Interactive Multimedia Education. Retrieved August 28 2006 from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2005/08.

 

Conole, G., & Fill, K. (2005). A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. Journal of Interactive Media in Education(September), 84-123.

 

Conole, G., & Jacobs, G. (2001). Editorial: the changing face of ALT-J. ALT-J, 9(1), 2-16.

 

Conole, G., & Oliver, M. (1998). A Pedagogical Framework for Embedding C&IT into the Curriculum. ALT-J, 6(2), 4.

 

Conole, G., Oliver, M., Falconer, I., Littlejohn, A., & Harvey, J. (2007). Designing for learning. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice. Cambridge: RoutledgeFalmer.

 

Cooney, D. H. (1998). Sharing aspects within Aspects: Real-time collaboration in the high school English classroom. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprentice ship, and discourse (pp. 263-287). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

 

Cornbleth, C. (1990). Curriculum in Context. Basingstoke, UK: Falmer Press.

 

Cowan, J. (2004). Building students' writing and evaluation skills: Developing reflective self and peer assessment. Retrieved February 25, 2007, from http://www.c-sap.bham.ac.uk/resources/project_reports/findings/ShowFinding.asp?id=106.

 

Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning. London: Routledge.

 

Dean, P., Stahl, M., Sylwester, D., & Pear, J. (2001). Effectiveness of Combined Delivery Modalities for Distance Learning and Resident Learning. Quarterly Review Of Distance Education, 2(3), 247-254.

 

DeBourgh, G. (2003). Predictors of student satisfaction in distance-delivered graduate nursing courses: What matters most? Journal of Professional Nursing, 19(3), 149-163.

 

DeLacey, B. J., & Leonard, D. A. (2002). Case study on technology and distance in education at the Harvard Business School. Educational Technology and Society, 5(2), 13-28.

 

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

 

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1994). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing critical features from and instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-72.

 

Falconer, I., & Littlejohn, A. (2006). Mod4L Report: Case Studies, Exemplars and Learning Designs [Electronic Version]. Retrieved February 22 2007 from http://mod4l.com/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=2.

 

Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78, 674-681.

 

Fitzpatrick, S. (2003). A Review of Web-based Learning and Teaching: Learn2elearn [Electronic Version]. Retrieved July 01 2008 from http://www.le.ac.uk/cc/rjm1/etutor/elearning/reviewofwebbasedtl.html.

 

Fleming, N., & Bonwell, C. C. (1998). VARK: A guide to learning styles [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 2 January 2005 from http://www.vark-learn.com/english/index.asp.

 

Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wagner, E. D. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

 

Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1990). Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and literate discourse. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky in education: Instructional implications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 175-205). New York: Cambridge University Press.

 

Goodyear, P. (2001). Effective networked learning in higher education: notes and guidelines [Electronic Version]. Retrieved July 17 2003 from http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/jisc/advice.htm.

 

Goodyear, P. (2002). Psychological foundations for networked learning. In C. Steeples & C. Jones (Eds.), Networked learning: perspectives and issues (pp. 49-75). London: Springer Verlag.

 

Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82-101.

 

Goodyear, P., & Jones, C. (2001). Pedagogical frameworks for DNER (the Distributed National Electronic Resource), Resource), Deliverable DC1. Lancaster: Lancaster University.

 

Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or Praxis. Lewes: Falmer.

 

Halcrow, C. (2003). E-learning and the e-GIF. Oxford: ALT.

 

Hall, J. W. (1996). The educational paradigm shift. Open Praxis, ICDE, 2, 27-36.

 

Hammond, N. (1993). Learning with hypertext: Problems, principles and prospects. In M. C, D. A & R. J (Eds.), Hypertext: A Psychological Perspective. London: Ellis Horwood.

 

Hara, N., & Kling, R. (1999). Students' frustrations with a web-based distance education course: A taboo topic in the discourse. Retrieved May 28, 2003, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue4_12/hara/.

 

Harper, B., & Hedberg, J. Creating Motivating Interactive Learning Environments: a Constructivist View [Electronic Version]. Retrieved June 6 2002 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth97/papers/Harper/Harper.html.

 

Harvey, J. (1998). LTDI Evaluation Cook Book [Electronic Version]. Retrieved July 17 2003 from http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/ltdi-pub.htm#Cookbook.

 

Jonassen, D., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer-mediated versus face-to-face group problem-solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35-51.

 

Jonassen, D. H. (1995). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Educational Technology & Society(July-August), 60-63.

 

Jones, B., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J., & Rasmussen, C. (1994). Designing Learning and Technology for Educational Reform. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

 

Jones, C. (2000). From the sage on the stage to what exactly? Description and the place of the moderator in co-operative and collaborative learning. In D. Squires, G. Jacobs & G. Conole (Eds.), The changing face of learning technology. Selected papers from ALT-J. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

 

Jones, C., & Asensio, M. (2002). Designs for networked learning in higher education: a phenomenographic investigation of practitioners' accounts of design. In C. Steeples & C. Jones (Eds.), Networked learning: Perspectives and issues (pp. 253-278). London: Springer Verlag.

 

Jones, C., Asensio, M., & Goodyear, P. (2000). Networked Learning in higher education: Practitioners perspectives. ALT-J, 8(2), 18-28.

 

Jones, C., Asensio, M., & Goodyear, P. (2000). Networked learning in higher education: Practitioners' perspectives. Journal of the Association for Learning Technology, 8(2), 18-28.

 

Joughin, G., & Johnston, S. (1994). The experience of collaboration: Writing and instructional design in distance education. Distance Education, 15(1).

 

Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Activity theory in a nutshell, acting with technology. In Activity Theory and Interaction Design (pp. 29–72). Cambridge, Massachusettes: MIT Press.

 

Kelly, A. V. (1999). The Curriculum. Theory and practice (2nd ed. Vol. 4e). London: Paul Chapman.

Kelly, M. E. (1987). Course teams and instructional design in Australian distance education: A reply to Shaw and Taylor. Distance Education, 8(1), 106-121.

 

Kharma, N., & Hajjaj, A. (1997). Errors in English among Arabic speakers: Analysis and rememdy. Beirut: Librarie du Liban.

 

Knight, G., & Richards, T. (2006). An ontology-based framework for bridging learning design and learning content. Education, Technology and Society, 9(1), 23-37.

 

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

 

Kolb, D. A. (1985). LSI Learning-Style Inventory. Boston, MA: McBer & Company.

 

Koper, R. (2001). Modelling units of study from a pedagogical perspective. The pedagogical meta-model behind EML [Electronic Version]. Retrieved February 22 2005 from http://www.learningnetworks.org/downloads/ped-metamodel.pdf.

Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: an introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Kramsch, C., A' Ness, F., & Lam, W. S. E. (2000). Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 78-104.

 

Kuutti, K. (1991). Activity theory and its application to information systems development and research. In H. E. Nissen (Ed.), Information systems research (pp. 529-549). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publications.

 

Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Education: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

 

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

 

LeLoup, J. W., & Ponterio, R. (1996). Choosing and using materials for a 'net' gain in FL learning and instruction. In V. B. Levine (Ed.), Reaching Out to the Communities We Serve (pp. 23-32). New York: NYSAFLT Annual Meeting Series 13.

 

Littlejohn, A. (2004). The Effectiveness of Resources, Tools and Support Services used by Practitioners in Designing and Delivering e-Learning Activities: JISC-commissioned report.

 

Littlejohn, A., & Peacock, S. (2003). From Pioneers to Partners: The changing voices of staff developers. In J. Seale (Ed.), Learning Technology in Transition: From individual enthusiasm to institutional implementation. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.

 

Liu, M., Gibby, S., Quiros, O., & Demps, E. (2003). The Challenges of being an instructional designer for new media development: A view from the practitioners. Journal of Educational Hypermedia and Multimedia, 9(2), 1-28.

 

Lockwood, F., & Gooley, A. (2001). Innovation in Open and Distance Learning: Succesful development of online and web-based learning. London: Kogan Page.

 

Mason, R. D., Pegler, C. A., & Weller, M. J. (2005). A learning object success story. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(1), 97- 105.

 

Mayes, J., & Fowler, C. J. H. (1999). Learning Technology and Usability: A Framework for Understanding Courseware. Interacting With Computers, 11, 485-497.

 

Mayes, T., & de Freitas, S. (2004). JISC e-Learning Models Desk Study: Review of e-learning theories,

frameworks and models [Electronic Version]. Retrieved July 01 2008 from www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Stage%202%20Learning%20Models%20(Version%201).pdf

 

McAteer, E., Tolmie, A., Duffy, C., & Corbett, J. (1997). Computer mediated communication as a learning resource. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(4), 219-227.

 

McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.

McLoughlin, C. (1999). Culturally responsive technology use: Developing an on-line community of learners. British Journal of Technology, 30(3), 231-243.

 

McLoughlin, C. (2004). Researching Quality: What Does It Mean For Curriculum And Assessment In E-Learning Environments? Retrieved 10 June, 2005, from http://www.aare.edu.au/02pap/mcl02637.htm.

 

McLoughlin, C., & Gower, G. (2000). Indigenous learners on-line: A model for flexible learning in an innovative Web-based environment. Retrieved 27 June, 2005, from http://www.curriculumsupport.nsw.edu.au/AboriginalStudies/files/Abo_cmclough.pdf?CFID=684480&CFTOKEN=57501918.

 

McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R. (1998). Maximising the language and learning link in computer learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 125-136.

 

Merrill, M. D. (1996). What new paradigm of ISD? Letters to the Editor, Educational Technologies(July-August), 57-61.

 

Merrill, M. D. (2007). A Task-Centered Instructional Strategy. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 33-50.

 

Milligan, C. D. (1999). Delivering Staff and Professional Development using Virtual Learning Environments [Electronic Version]. Retrieved June 30 2008 from http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/jtap-573/deliverables.html.

 

Moran, D., & Owen, H. (2008). Transforming students' approaches to learning and applying mathematics. In Learning Technologies and Mathematics Middle East Conference (pp. 56-69). Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

 

Murray, D. E. (1993). Collaborative writing as a literacy event: Implications for ESL instruction. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (2nd ed., pp. 100-117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Murray, D. E. (1993). Collaborative writing as a literacy event: Implications for ESL instruction. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (2nd ed., pp. 100-117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2004). Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning [Electronic Version]. Retrieved April 12 2008 from http://elearning.typepad.com/thelearnedman/mobile_learning/reports/futurelab_review_11.pdf.

 

Nardi, B. (1995). Studying context: a comparison of Activity Theory, situated action models and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-101). Cambridge: MA.

 

Newman, E., & Ingram, G. (1989). The Youth Work Curriculum. London: Further Education Unit (FEU).

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston MA: Heinle & Heinle.

 

O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0 - Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software [Electronic Version]. Retrieved January 29 2007 from http://oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.

 

Owen, H. (2008a). Learners re-shaping learning landscapes: New directions for old challenges? Paper presented at the Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology: ASCILITE 2008, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

 

Owen, H. (2008b). Embrace the new era: Integrating ICT enhanced learning into curricula. In Student Success; A New Era in Ways of Learning (pp. 1-15). Hawke's Bay, New Zealand: EIT.

 

Owen, H. (2008c). Programme design that puts the ‘Me’ back into learning experiences and spaces [Electronic Version]. My Place, My Space, My Learning - Distance and Virtual Education: DEANZ 2008 Conference. Retrieved September 10 2008 from http://deanz.org.nz/home/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&catid=52%3Aconference-2008&id=115%3Adeanz-conference-2008-sessions&Itemid=93.

 

Owen, H. (2008d). Promoting Blended Approaches to Teaching and Learning at Unitec:A Proposal. Auckland: Unitec New Zealand.

 

Owen, H. (2008e). Information and communication technology used in a blended learning environment: Enhancing writing and vocabulary acquisition? In ESL writing and computer mediated communication: A help or a hindrance? Dubai, UAE: Higher Colleges of Technology.

 

Owen, H., & Allardice, R. (2007). Managing the implementation of blended E-learning initiatives with the unconverted in a climate of institutionally driven change. The International Journal of Learning, 14(9), 179-192.

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Orion Press.

 

Plass, J. L. (1998). Design and Evaluation of the User Interface of Foreign Language Multimedia Software: A Cognitive Approach. Language Learning and Technology, 2(1), 35-45.

 

Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting Visual and Verbal Learning Preferences in a Second Language Multimedia Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 25-36.

 

Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 221-243.

 

Plass, J. L., & Salisbury, M. W. (2002). A living systems design model for web-based knowledge management systems. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50, 35-58.

 

Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding Learning and teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.

 

Puccio, P. M. (1993). The computer-networked writing lab: one instructor's view. Retrieved May 30, 2002, from http://ericir.syr.edu/plweb-cgi/obtain.pl.

 

Ramsden, P. (1992). Assessing for understanding. London: Routledge.

 

Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional Design Theories and Models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Reigeluth, C. M. (1996). Of paradigms lost and gained. Letters to the Editor, Educational Technologies(July-August), 57-61.

 

Reigeluth, C. M. (1996). A new paradigm of ISD? Educational Technology(May-June), 13-20.

 

Reigeluth, C. M. (1997). Instructional technology, practitioner needs, and new directions: Some reflections. Educational Technology(Jan-Feb), 42-47.

 

Roblyer, M., Edwards, J., & Havriluk, M. (1997). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. Colombus, Ohio: Prentice Hall.

 

Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. D. Rio & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). New York: Cambridge University Press.

 

Romiszowski, A., & Mason, R. (2004). Computer-mediated communication. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 397-431). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

 

Rossett, A., Douglis, F., & Frazee, R. V. (2003). Strategies for Building Blended Learning [Electronic Version]. Retrieved June 20 2008 from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2003/jul2003/rossett.htm.

 

Rothery, A., & Jenkins, M. (1999). Supporting Learning and Teaching through Collaboration. Oxford: UCISA.

 

Salmon, G. (2000). E-Moderating: The key to Teaching and Learning online. London: Kogan Page Limited.

 

Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities. The key to active online learning. London: Kogan Page.

 

Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions – psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Salomon, G., Perkins, D., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 4, 2-8.

 

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher level of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 37-68.

 

Schuell, T. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411-436.

 

Schuell, T. J. (1996). The role of educational psychology in the preparation of teachers. Educational Psychologist, 31(1), 5-14.

 

Seale, J., & Rius-Riu, M. (2001). An introduction to learning technology within tertiary education in the UK: A Handbook for Learning Technologist. Oxford: ALT.

 

Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1998). Making Instructional Design Decisions (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

 

Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1998). Making Instructional Design Decisions (2nd ed.). Merril, NJ: Prentice Hall.

 

Semones, L. (2001). Collaboration, Computer Mediation, and the Foreign Language. Clearing House, 74(6), 308-317.

 

Semones, L. (2001). Collaboration, computer mediation, and the foreign language writer. Collaboration and Computer Mediation, 74(6), 308-312.

 

Smith, M. K. (2000). Curriculum theory and practice [Electronic Version]. The encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved June 10 2008 from www.infed.org/biblio/b-curric.htm.

 

Snelbecker, G. E. (1987). Contrasting and complementary approaches to instructional design. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Theories in Action (pp. 321-337). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heineman.

 

Struthers, J. (2002). Working Models for Designing Online Courses and Materials [Electronic Version]. Retrieved June 17 2008 from http://www.ltsn.ac.uk/genericcentre/index.asp?id=17113.

 

Sullivan, N. (1993). Teaching writing on a computer network. TESOL Journal(Autumn), 34-35.

 

Svinicki, M. D., & Dixon, N. M. (1987). The Kolb model modified for classroom activities. College Teaching, 35(4), 141-146.

 

Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Troupin, P. (2000). The role of instructional design in multimedia development. Retrieved January 14, 2007, from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2000/feb200/Troupin.htm.

 

United Nations Development Programme. (2003). Arab human development report 2003: Building a knowledge society (No. 92-1-126157-0). New York: United Nations Publications.

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Thought and Word. from http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/words/vygotsky.htm.

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Rev ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

 

Wagner, E. D., & McCombs, B. L. (1995). Learner-centered psychological principles in practice: Designs for distance education. Educational Technology, 35(2), 32-35.

 

Wang, Q., & Woo, H. L. (2007). Systematic Planning for ICT Integration in Topic Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 148-156.

 

Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp. 1-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Waxman, H., & Huang, S. L. (1996). Classroom instruction differences by level of technology use in middle school mathematics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 147-159.

 

Waxman, H., Lin, M.-F., & Michko, G. M. (2003). A Meta-Analysis of the effectiveness of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/effects2/index.html

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

 

Wiles, K. (2003). Introduction. In S. Armitage & R. O’Leary (Eds.), A guide for learning technologists (pp. 1-2). York: Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN).

 

Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory. A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy [Electronic Version]. Retrieved February 21 2005 from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc.

 

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman. 

 

Creative Commons License

ICT Enhanced Learning and Teaching Framework and Model by Hazel Owen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 New Zealand License.

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.